| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
General
Information |
|
| |
(416) 516-3524 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Industry Trends
Topics and Trends Report, Q2 2010
COURT AFFIRMS HEALTH CANADA'S BROAD DISCRETION IN REVIEW OF DRUG SUBMISSIONS
A manufacturer must apply for marketing approval, Notice of Compliance (NOC) before a
drug can be sold in Canada. To obtain the NOC, the manufacturer must apply to Health
Canada for a new drug submission (NDS). Hospira filed its NDS without any clinical data
but relied on the wide-spread use of the drug to establish safety and efficacy. Health
Canada rejected the NDS for failure to comply with regulation requirements. Hospira
applied to set aside this decision.
The Federal Court in Hospira Healthcare Corporate vs Canada affirmed that Health
Canada has broad discretion in interpreting the Food and Drug Regulations in
determining the content of an application for the marketing approval of a drug.
ONTARIO MOVES FORWARD WITH GENERIC PRICING REFORM
Much to the chagrin of Pharmacy and the generic industry, the Ontario government has
moved forward on reducing generic pricing from 50% to 25% of Brand for the public
market. It also is reducing generic pricing in the private and cash market to 25% over a
three year phased period. The price reductions will likely see over 53% of Canada move
to 25% soon.
They also attacked the current levels and use of Professional Allowances reducing them
from 20% to 5% on the public side and phasing in controls and reductions on the private
side over the next three years.
The reaction by Pharmacy has been volatile and this battle will be ongoing in Ontario right
up to next year’s election.
ARE PROVINCIAL LISTING AGREEMENTS FINISHED?
Since 2006, some Provincial governments and the industry have been in private
negotiations aimed at listing new chemical entities as well as lowering prescription costs.
Because the Ontario Drug Benefit is one of the world’s largest purchasers of
pharmaceuticals, manufacturers were prepared to cut deals they wouldn’t elsewhere. As
such, the government pays much less than the listed price, because the ompanies returnpart of the money through rebates. To avoid other governments and private drug plans
demanding the same deal, these rebates are kept confidential.
The confidential aspect now appears to be unravelling. Following a back and forth battle
with the Privacy Commissioner, the Executive Officer released 2007 quarterly data for 47
different companies. Many Corporate head offices are now asking local executives how
this information, guaranteed to remain private, is now public.
Quebec now is threatening legal actions against any of these companies that have not
given the lower price to Quebec as is the current agreement with Industry. It is rumoured
that BC is thinking of releasing their deals.
Stay tuned as this will become interesting if the companies cancel the current deals,
leaving the Provincial governments a difficult decision to remove the newly listed products
from the formulary
IS GET-UP GONE IN CANADA?
The recent decision of the Federal Court of Canada in Apotex v. Registrar of Trade-marks
and Glaxo Group Limited (March 12, 2010) continues a line of cases that restricts the use
of ‘get-up’, (which refers to colour, shape of packaging, etc.) as a trademark in respect of
prescription pharmaceutical products.
Glaxo Group Limited had obtained a trademark registration for the dark and light purple
colours as applied to certain portions of the visible surface of an inhaler. Apotex and other
generic drug manufacturers instituted proceedings to strike out this trademark registration
on the grounds that it was not distinctive.
HEALTH CANADA RELEASES FINAL GUIDANCE ON SUBSEQUENT ENTRY BIOLOGICS
Health Canada has released the final version of its guidance document Guidance for
Sponsors: Information and Submission Requirements for Subsequent Entry Biologics
(SEBs) (Final Guidance), which is an update of the draft guidance released by Health
Canada on January 30, 2008 and March 27, 2009 and applies to all pending and future
drug submissions for SEBs in Canada.
An SEB is defined by Health Canada as "a biologic drug that enters the market
subsequent to a version previously authorized in Canada, and with demonstrated
similarity to a reference biologic drug." SEB manufacturers may make reference to the
information contained in an innovator’s biologic drug submission – that is, the reference
biologic drug submission – in order to reduce the amount of clinical data required to
obtain marketing approval for its product.
This is one of the most important issues between the Brand and generic Industry as the
majority of current and future growth is in this category of medications.
EMERGING' MARKETS WILL ACCOUNT FOR 48% OF MARKET GROWTH IN 2013
An IMS Health study suggests that high-growth pharmaceutical markets, such as China,
Brazil, Russia and India, will account for 48 percent of market growth in 2013, compared
to 37 percent in 2009. The review identified 10 new "pharmerging" countries, up from
seven countries labelled in 2006, forecasted to grow significantly during the period.
Canada now ranks ninth, and it will continue to be difficult to obtain corporate investment
if we continue to slip and market access delays continue.
QUEBEC'S MEDICAL-USER-FEE FINDS "LOOPHOLE" IN CANADA
Premier Jean Charest insisted he would go ahead with the plan to impose user fees for
public health-care services. The government needs an additional $500-million a year to
cover a portion of rising health care costs and it plans to collect it through a form of user
fees. .
The PQ position is that once people realize that those who must visit doctors regularly,
such as pregnant women, cancer patients and the chronically ill, all of whom will be asked
to pay for the medical visits, the protest will become so widespread, that the government
will have no choice but to retreat.
This will be an interesting battle and all Provinces are watching.
For more information, please call Joe Knott at
416-516-3524
Email: jknott@pangaea-consultants.com
www.pangaea-consultants.com
|
|
|
|